now it could go either way at home

we may play well or we may not. Under Hughton, we picked up results at home much more often than not, even against the big teams.

Strange timing to replace him.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on April 13th 2014 at 11:09:44

Message Thread

was the Adams gamble basically all on yesterday? (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 13, 10:36:42
- It doesnt matter Hughton is gone - clean sheets or letting a hatful we will never know but (NCFC) - DickyVonStinkhorn, Apr 13, 11:22:20
  - always back them - have no fear of that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 13, 11:28:09
- This is the thread of reason! (n/m) (NCFC) - manc_yello, Apr 13, 11:15:30
  - Hangover brigade have yet to arrive mind (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 13, 11:28:42
- agree, looks like a panic decision (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 13, 11:08:39
- Totally agree I thought this whole situation is ridiculous (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Apr 13, 11:02:50
- Agreed. Four clean sheets just might be enough for us, but I don't see Neil having the def (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 13, 10:55:26
  - i don't think Hoots would have avoided a loss yesterday (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 13, 11:03:20
    - now it could go either way at home (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 13, 11:09:44
      - I don't normally agree with you, Mick, but on this occasion (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 13, 11:29:59
- Same here. I'd rather have Hoots for upcoming games. (n/m) (NCFC) - manc_yello, Apr 13, 10:45:30
- VVVVVVVmuch this^^^^^^^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 13, 10:40:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.