was the Adams gamble basically all on yesterday?

Given Hoots' atrocious away form and taking into account yesterdays opposition?

TBH I think I would feel more confident with Hughton in charge for the remaining games. Can we get him back?

Posted By: South_West_Canary on April 13th 2014 at 10:36:42

Message Thread

was the Adams gamble basically all on yesterday? (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 13, 10:36:42
- It doesnt matter Hughton is gone - clean sheets or letting a hatful we will never know but (NCFC) - DickyVonStinkhorn, Apr 13, 11:22:20
  - always back them - have no fear of that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 13, 11:28:09
- This is the thread of reason! (n/m) (NCFC) - manc_yello, Apr 13, 11:15:30
  - Hangover brigade have yet to arrive mind (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 13, 11:28:42
- agree, looks like a panic decision (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 13, 11:08:39
- Totally agree I thought this whole situation is ridiculous (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Apr 13, 11:02:50
- Agreed. Four clean sheets just might be enough for us, but I don't see Neil having the def (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 13, 10:55:26
  - i don't think Hoots would have avoided a loss yesterday (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 13, 11:03:20
    - now it could go either way at home (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 13, 11:09:44
      - I don't normally agree with you, Mick, but on this occasion (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 13, 11:29:59
- Same here. I'd rather have Hoots for upcoming games. (n/m) (NCFC) - manc_yello, Apr 13, 10:45:30
- VVVVVVVmuch this^^^^^^^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 13, 10:40:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.