I think Hooper is better overall

but when they are both struggling to score, RvW offers more with his pressing off the ball. Our best results and performances recently have all come with RvW starting, not Hooper - I don't think it's a coincidence.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on March 29th 2014 at 14:38:50

Message Thread

I like the fact we are being positive but feel sorry for Hooper (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:19:48
- Know what you mean, but (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 29, 14:29:41
  - I agree. Happy with the team other than would prefer Hooper to RVW. Lets hope today (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:31:12
    - Amen! (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 29, 14:32:50
- Could it be because Hoops knows Lennon? (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 29, 14:26:16
  - interesting... (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:26:43
    - Don't encourage him. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 29, 14:28:26
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 29, 14:24:20
- Elmander better in this role (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 29, 14:22:12
  - 2 weeks ago elmander couldnt wipe an arse,1 half decent game and hes brilliant . (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:23:38
    - He's had a few good games as a second striker (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 29, 14:25:39
      - not very good.end of (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:26:10
  - He does set ip Super too tho (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Mar 29, 14:23:05
    - *up* (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Mar 29, 14:23:18
      - True. This might be RvWs last chance (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 29, 14:27:29
- vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:21:20
- I think Hooper is the better finisher (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:20:52
  - really? he's better at holding the ball up than RVW (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 29, 14:22:56
    - watch the way RvW closes down the Swansea defence today (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:24:45
      - Hooper links play superbly. If Hughton f**ks him off by picking (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:27:10
        
        did you watch our last game? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:28:11
        
        Ps I hope RVW scores obviously (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:30:21
        
        Yes I did. It was not fluent because of RVW (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:29:51
        
        I think that's an exaggeration - RvW was excellent v Spurs as well (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:32:52
        
        No he really was not. Unless you mean by excellent (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:36:29
        
        I think Hooper is better overall (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:38:50
        
        would have been our record goal tally if ricky hadn't missed sitters (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:29:27
      - I'd rather have someone who is capable of scoring from 6 yards out (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 29, 14:26:33
      - that's what we want from our record signing striker (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:26:24
        
        well, if Hooper had been banging the goals in then he would obviously be starting (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:27:06
        
        No he does not. He is poor on the ball. Ok maybe he runs around more. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:28:33
        
        after the misses last week i think hooper should be starting (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:28:32
  - Wolfy does like a run (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Mar 29, 14:22:41
    - wish he would keep running.........as far away as possible (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:24:36
  - elmander is a poor mans holt,rvw is ,well just shit (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:22:14
  - ricky defo better without the ball (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:22:06
    - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:22:28

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.