No he really was not. Unless you mean by excellent

Ran about a bit and worked hard. I could do that. Unfortunately the stuff you pay ?8.5m for like shooting and controlling the ball was a bit ropey.

Don't get me wrong I hope the guy comes good but Hooper is much better and does not deserve to find himself behind RVW in the pecking order.

Posted By: Jim on March 29th 2014 at 14:36:29

Message Thread

I like the fact we are being positive but feel sorry for Hooper (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:19:48
- Know what you mean, but (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 29, 14:29:41
  - I agree. Happy with the team other than would prefer Hooper to RVW. Lets hope today (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:31:12
    - Amen! (NCFC) - Under soil heating, Mar 29, 14:32:50
- Could it be because Hoops knows Lennon? (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 29, 14:26:16
  - interesting... (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:26:43
    - Don't encourage him. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 29, 14:28:26
- Agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Mar 29, 14:24:20
- Elmander better in this role (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 29, 14:22:12
  - 2 weeks ago elmander couldnt wipe an arse,1 half decent game and hes brilliant . (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:23:38
    - He's had a few good games as a second striker (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 29, 14:25:39
      - not very good.end of (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:26:10
  - He does set ip Super too tho (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Mar 29, 14:23:05
    - *up* (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Mar 29, 14:23:18
      - True. This might be RvWs last chance (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Mar 29, 14:27:29
- vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:21:20
- I think Hooper is the better finisher (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:20:52
  - really? he's better at holding the ball up than RVW (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 29, 14:22:56
    - watch the way RvW closes down the Swansea defence today (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:24:45
      - Hooper links play superbly. If Hughton f**ks him off by picking (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:27:10
        
        did you watch our last game? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:28:11
        
        Ps I hope RVW scores obviously (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:30:21
        
        Yes I did. It was not fluent because of RVW (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:29:51
        
        I think that's an exaggeration - RvW was excellent v Spurs as well (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:32:52
        
        No he really was not. Unless you mean by excellent (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:36:29
        
        I think Hooper is better overall (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:38:50
        
        would have been our record goal tally if ricky hadn't missed sitters (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:29:27
      - I'd rather have someone who is capable of scoring from 6 yards out (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 29, 14:26:33
      - that's what we want from our record signing striker (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:26:24
        
        well, if Hooper had been banging the goals in then he would obviously be starting (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 29, 14:27:06
        
        No he does not. He is poor on the ball. Ok maybe he runs around more. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 29, 14:28:33
        
        after the misses last week i think hooper should be starting (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:28:32
  - Wolfy does like a run (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Mar 29, 14:22:41
    - wish he would keep running.........as far away as possible (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:24:36
  - elmander is a poor mans holt,rvw is ,well just shit (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:22:14
  - ricky defo better without the ball (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 29, 14:22:06
    - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, Mar 29, 14:22:28

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.