the board should've taken the hard decision beforehand on the basis of results
no matter how good the performances are (and they haven't been *that* good anyway), if your man can't get the results, then he needs to be changed.
Tbf it should've been taken when it was clear we'd started going backwards
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on February 12th 2014 at 15:11:14
Message Thread
- How come he hasnt gone yet? (NCFC) - um_gah, Feb 12, 14:34:13
- What puzzles me is why there such as massive media reaction (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:48:59
- I think there was a genuine sense he'd go after Fulham (NCFC) - bjg123, Feb 12, 14:51:36
- *was such a (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:49:30
- Because it was far more likely he'd be sacked during the transfer window (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 14:51:08
- Go on a disastrous run? (NCFC) - um_gah, Feb 12, 15:19:51
- Yes, so basically everyone just given up (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:53:39
- I have! (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Feb 12, 15:37:33
- me too! most of my mates resigned to going down.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 12, 17:09:56
- well, its also unlikely a manager would be sacked after a pretty good performance (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 14:57:35
- Even if he deliberately acted to change that good performance into a poor one? (NCFC) - bjg123, Feb 12, 15:04:09
- you don't really think that. That'd be ridiculous (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:09:16
- I think that he actively changed our tactics to give a greater chance of a clean sheet (NCFC) - bjg123, Feb 12, 15:24:09
- you don't really think that. That'd be ridiculous (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:09:16
- Sadly performances mean nothing at this stage of the season (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:59:05
- Don't know about that. Had we been total gash and lost 2-0 (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:01:26
- Agree with that (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 15:04:31
- the board should've taken the hard decision beforehand on the basis of results (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:11:14
- ^vmt (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 12, 17:11:47
- the board should've taken the hard decision beforehand on the basis of results (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:11:14
- Agree with that (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 15:04:31
- Don't know about that. Had we been total gash and lost 2-0 (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:01:26
- Even if he deliberately acted to change that good performance into a poor one? (NCFC) - bjg123, Feb 12, 15:04:09
- I have! (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Feb 12, 15:37:33
- Because it was far more likely he'd be sacked during the transfer window (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 14:51:08
- Well quite. Should have backed or sacked in jan. did neither. (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Feb 12, 14:40:13
- I don't blame Hughton in the least (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 12, 14:39:02
- Their thinking must be that teams who've changed managers are still struggling (NCFC) - bird table, Feb 12, 14:58:47
- "but"-might (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 12, 14:40:03
- What puzzles me is why there such as massive media reaction (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:48:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.