Even if he deliberately acted to change that good performance into a poor one?
I really think that's what he did, he saw us breaking in numbers and attacking and shat his pants. That's why Elmander came on and the balls went direct and that's Why Pilks came on and played about 15 yards deeper than Redmond.
Posted By: bjg123 on February 12th 2014 at 15:04:09
Message Thread
- How come he hasnt gone yet? (NCFC) - um_gah, Feb 12, 14:34:13
- What puzzles me is why there such as massive media reaction (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:48:59
- I think there was a genuine sense he'd go after Fulham (NCFC) - bjg123, Feb 12, 14:51:36
- *was such a (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:49:30
- Because it was far more likely he'd be sacked during the transfer window (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 14:51:08
- Go on a disastrous run? (NCFC) - um_gah, Feb 12, 15:19:51
- Yes, so basically everyone just given up (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:53:39
- I have! (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Feb 12, 15:37:33
- me too! most of my mates resigned to going down.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 12, 17:09:56
- well, its also unlikely a manager would be sacked after a pretty good performance (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 14:57:35
- Even if he deliberately acted to change that good performance into a poor one? (NCFC) - bjg123, Feb 12, 15:04:09
- you don't really think that. That'd be ridiculous (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:09:16
- I think that he actively changed our tactics to give a greater chance of a clean sheet (NCFC) - bjg123, Feb 12, 15:24:09
- you don't really think that. That'd be ridiculous (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:09:16
- Sadly performances mean nothing at this stage of the season (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:59:05
- Don't know about that. Had we been total gash and lost 2-0 (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:01:26
- Agree with that (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 15:04:31
- the board should've taken the hard decision beforehand on the basis of results (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:11:14
- ^vmt (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Feb 12, 17:11:47
- the board should've taken the hard decision beforehand on the basis of results (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:11:14
- Agree with that (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 15:04:31
- Don't know about that. Had we been total gash and lost 2-0 (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 15:01:26
- Even if he deliberately acted to change that good performance into a poor one? (NCFC) - bjg123, Feb 12, 15:04:09
- I have! (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Feb 12, 15:37:33
- Because it was far more likely he'd be sacked during the transfer window (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 12, 14:51:08
- Well quite. Should have backed or sacked in jan. did neither. (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Feb 12, 14:40:13
- I don't blame Hughton in the least (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 12, 14:39:02
- Their thinking must be that teams who've changed managers are still struggling (NCFC) - bird table, Feb 12, 14:58:47
- "but"-might (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Feb 12, 14:40:03
- What puzzles me is why there such as massive media reaction (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 12, 14:48:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.