It did indirectly result in their goal because

Until he made those changes we were completely on top. With those subs we lost all attacking impetus thus allowing them to push forward more which ultimately led to the goal.

Had we still been applying pressure I'm pretty convinced we would have winner at least not lost.

Posted By: Jim on February 11th 2014 at 23:08:17

Message Thread

lots of anger after that which is fair enough, but if we're playing the blame game (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 11, 22:53:14
- Every hughton inner from the last 12 months (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 11, 23:14:02
- I think Hooper's chances were the real killer (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 11, 22:59:44
- Their profligacy is much down to confidence (NCFC) - talbotsunbeamer, Feb 11, 22:58:52
- OK I think we should go from being plenty good enough to the newish manager (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 11, 22:56:47
- That's football. The ball is round. (NCFC) - norway, Feb 11, 22:55:53
  - It's spherical (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 11, 23:38:17
  - i wouldnt put the whole match outcome down to one poor sub decision (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 11, 22:58:19
    - Very fine margins involved... that sub was just embarrassingly poor (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 23:00:05
      - indeed (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 11, 23:02:06
        
        It did indirectly result in their goal because (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 11, 23:08:17
        
        nonsense (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 11, 23:14:00
        
        No. It came from a free kick didn't it? From what was basically (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 11, 23:24:04
        
        sdes (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 11, 23:13:29
        
        despite missed chances I still thought we were going to win it until the changes, when we (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 11, 23:15:21
        
        Precisely this. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 11, 23:09:50
        
        It was an incredibly shit goal to give away regardless of who was on the pitch. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Feb 11, 23:08:58
        
        Yes but the best way of avoiding it would have been (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 11, 23:12:12
        
        No I was watching a stream. (NCFC) - lurd, Feb 11, 23:13:57
        
        Agree we fucked up yes. Sadly this season we have no margin for error in any game (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 11, 23:21:52
        
        That is down to confidence I imagine. We don't score many (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 23:05:28
- Hughton has got 18 months history as well though (n/m) (NCFC) - Jacksons_Twelfth, Feb 11, 22:54:14
  - yes,on tonights game i should have said (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 11, 22:56:32
    - 18 months creating a side which struggles for goals. (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 11, 22:58:01
  - 18 months of Norwich Nil (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 11, 22:55:11

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.