I'd have to disagree when Elmander plays yes its more 4-4-1-1 just..but
certainly against Newcastle that was as much 4-4-2 as you're ever likely to see. Hooper or RvW struggle to play in the hole. We need proper midfielders in the '3' not Hooper, RvW or Elmander.
Posted By: BINMEN8R on February 10th 2014 at 11:51:04
Message Thread
- One thing Saturday must have done is put an end to this 4-4-2 bollox. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 10, 10:50:49
- Why (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Feb 10, 11:53:39
- You'd hope so... (NCFC) - munchen, Feb 10, 11:17:31
- well it was 4411, but don't let that get in the way of the truth, one eye. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 10, 11:43:00
- I'd have to disagree when Elmander plays yes its more 4-4-1-1 just..but (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 10, 11:51:04
- it was deffo 4-5-1 against Man City, with Redmond the out ball (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 10, 12:49:51
- I'd have to disagree when Elmander plays yes its more 4-4-1-1 just..but (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 10, 11:51:04
- well it was 4411, but don't let that get in the way of the truth, one eye. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 10, 11:43:00
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.