Yeah, probably true. Just disapponting we don't seem to be looking to mix up things

When they clearly aren't working. An injury cover centre-back, a defensive midfielder and a defensive winger is not fixing any of that. Especially as we had seemed to have tightened things up.

Posted By: trafford_canary on January 29th 2014 at 11:11:49

Message Thread

Will be really disappointing if all we do is ge this Ciani fella and the Stoke midfielder. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jan 29, 10:52:48
- That's probably right (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Jan 29, 11:05:51
  - Yeah, probably true. Just disapponting we don't seem to be looking to mix up things (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jan 29, 11:11:49
  - Yep...with potential. Still the best squad in 20years (n/m) (NCFC) - chuftncfc, Jan 29, 11:10:00
    - Not suggesting otherwise. (NCFC) - Johnny Comecardiff, Jan 29, 11:13:47
      - Well said (n/m) (NCFC) - chuftncfc, Jan 29, 11:19:09
    - on paper. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Jan 29, 11:12:20
- Don't think stoke will sell whelan (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 29, 10:58:29
  - Loan? (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 29, 11:01:19
    - Hughes quoted as saying... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 29, 11:04:29
- We only have 2 centre-backs that are fit and the midfield are crap without Tettey (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 29, 10:56:25
  - Yep. I don't particularly have a problem with either being signed. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jan 29, 11:05:10
  - This odd... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 29, 11:00:07
    - Seemed to be in for Rannochia (sp?), with Ciani as Plan B. (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jan 29, 11:22:31
  - Get with the times (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 29, 10:59:41
    - Disagree. I'm not sure how much Tettey/Fer has been tried? (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jan 29, 11:07:23
    - haha (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 29, 11:01:19

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.