I think it was the obvious change to make

we had to bring Tettey on, as we couldn't play one in midfield. Elmander and Redmond had just come on, so it was Hooper or Snodgrass.

Given how Martin really struggled all night, not sure it was wise to leave our right wing completely open.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on January 28th 2014 at 22:10:50

Message Thread

Say what you like about the Hooper/Tettey sub (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:06:10
- Was no one watching the game???? (NCFC) - Drinklebells, Jan 28, 22:34:23
  - Well, from reading below, obviously not. The sub was a sacking offence... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:37:18
- we need to dotch the 4-4-2 (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 28, 22:13:38
  - Absolutely. Or get a second striker that plays as a second striker. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:15:09
    - vmt (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:16:38
- I think it was the obvious change to make (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:10:50
  - I honestly did think it was the right thing to do... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:14:07
  - I'd have taken Elmander off again (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 28, 22:12:14
  - Tettey should have started (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 28, 22:11:59
  - exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 28, 22:11:54
- You're right (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 28, 22:10:31
- Because Tettey can win, keep and pass the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 28, 22:08:51
- we need tettey, have missed him..... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 28, 22:08:11
- Haha your right!!! But the way he rushed tetty ready was shocking, and to pull hooper off (NCFC) - hoolahan, Jan 28, 22:07:53
- Tettey can pass a football (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:07:40
- Bringing tettey on was a good move, but not for our only goal threat (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 28, 22:07:35
  - We created as much in the last 10 as we did in the first 80 (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:10:05
    - 2 shots in the last 10 by the way. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:15:03
    - Didn't score (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:13:16
      - Well, thanks for arguing my point with a completely different one. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:16:10
        
        OK your point is BS, we had 7 shots in the first 80 minutes and 2 in the last 10 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:21:07
        
        ok phrankin - you're right again as usual. Take the arguing boots off now. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:23:45
        
        pointless arguing, you are right, we looked dangerous in the last 10 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:25:49
        
        Thank you. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:26:09
        
        who cares about how many shots we had? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:23:11
        
        no shit... 10 men each, both sides looked dangerous. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:24:50
  - well, we had our best chance of the game after he went off (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:09:17
    - I take it we missed, given our best striker was off the pitch. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:12:10
  - I can only guess Hooper had a bit of a knock (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 28, 22:08:03
- Spot on!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Norfolk un Way, Jan 28, 22:07:13
  - Should have taken off Elmander if anyone (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:08:04
    - After Ben Arfa was sent off ? No, Brad Johnno should have come off. Elmander was better (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 28, 22:10:06
      - Ooops. I see the flaw in that logic (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 28, 22:11:32
    - Again, tin hat on... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:09:27
      - also not very good for player/ team morale (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:17:36
        
        team morale... (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:21:48
      - Elmander = zero threat... as proved by no goals again. (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:11:43

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.