You're right

We do tend to play better with a forward who can hold up the ball & bring in others

Posted By: South_West_Canary on January 28th 2014 at 22:10:31

Message Thread

Say what you like about the Hooper/Tettey sub (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:06:10
- Was no one watching the game???? (NCFC) - Drinklebells, Jan 28, 22:34:23
  - Well, from reading below, obviously not. The sub was a sacking offence... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:37:18
- we need to dotch the 4-4-2 (n/m) (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Jan 28, 22:13:38
  - Absolutely. Or get a second striker that plays as a second striker. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:15:09
    - vmt (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:16:38
- I think it was the obvious change to make (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:10:50
  - I honestly did think it was the right thing to do... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:14:07
  - I'd have taken Elmander off again (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 28, 22:12:14
  - Tettey should have started (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 28, 22:11:59
  - exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 28, 22:11:54
- You're right (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Jan 28, 22:10:31
- Because Tettey can win, keep and pass the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 28, 22:08:51
- we need tettey, have missed him..... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 28, 22:08:11
- Haha your right!!! But the way he rushed tetty ready was shocking, and to pull hooper off (NCFC) - hoolahan, Jan 28, 22:07:53
- Tettey can pass a football (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:07:40
- Bringing tettey on was a good move, but not for our only goal threat (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 28, 22:07:35
  - We created as much in the last 10 as we did in the first 80 (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:10:05
    - 2 shots in the last 10 by the way. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:15:03
    - Didn't score (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:13:16
      - Well, thanks for arguing my point with a completely different one. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:16:10
        
        OK your point is BS, we had 7 shots in the first 80 minutes and 2 in the last 10 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:21:07
        
        ok phrankin - you're right again as usual. Take the arguing boots off now. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:23:45
        
        pointless arguing, you are right, we looked dangerous in the last 10 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:25:49
        
        Thank you. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:26:09
        
        who cares about how many shots we had? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:23:11
        
        no shit... 10 men each, both sides looked dangerous. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:24:50
  - well, we had our best chance of the game after he went off (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:09:17
    - I take it we missed, given our best striker was off the pitch. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:12:10
  - I can only guess Hooper had a bit of a knock (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 28, 22:08:03
- Spot on!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Norfolk un Way, Jan 28, 22:07:13
  - Should have taken off Elmander if anyone (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:08:04
    - After Ben Arfa was sent off ? No, Brad Johnno should have come off. Elmander was better (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 28, 22:10:06
      - Ooops. I see the flaw in that logic (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 28, 22:11:32
    - Again, tin hat on... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 28, 22:09:27
      - also not very good for player/ team morale (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 28, 22:17:36
        
        team morale... (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:21:48
      - Elmander = zero threat... as proved by no goals again. (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 28, 22:11:43

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.