I do hold him partly responsible

Because had he used Wes more like he should have done the situation probably would not have arisen. But it's also pretty obvious Wes has been tapped up and I believe he probably did refuse to play in that Cup game!

Posted By: Jim on January 21st 2014 at 21:30:36

Message Thread

I would not sell Wes, certainly not to Villa (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 21, 21:21:44
- I'm sure whatever happens Hughton will get all the blame (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 21, 21:27:24
  - So he should (NCFC) - Old Splat, Jan 21, 21:40:32
    - I love Wes but everyone can like or dislike certain type of football I hate (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 21, 21:54:36
    - and the only reason he occasionally loses the ball (NCFC) - ede, Jan 21, 21:48:29
      - not really - it's often because he hangs on to it too long. He's often closely marked (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jan 21, 22:01:40
        
        But don't forget... when you add his 'dispossed' and failed passes (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 21, 22:05:54
    - What a load of shit (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 21, 21:45:15
      - Fuck off (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Splat, Jan 21, 22:01:21
        
        No. You really have no understanding of the modern game (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 21, 22:13:43
  - I do hold him partly responsible (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 21, 21:30:36
    - pure guess work? (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 21, 21:43:17
      - It was obviously a made up injury... he rang in sick (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 21, 21:44:18
  - 4sure (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jan 21, 21:29:01
    - Undoubtedly (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Jan 21, 21:30:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.