From this half of the season, we should have had six more points than we currently do.

We should have worked harder to secure a draw against a ten-man Hull. We should have put away our chances against Cardiff. We should have held on for a point against a poor Fulham side and against Villa.

All other results were probably fair even if the performances were not up to scratch and the goals conceded unacceptable- but there is no reason why this team of players are not capable of being 10th. Hoping that as we are showing signs of improvement, we should be able to right some of those wrongs in the second half of the season.

Posted By: tim berry on December 29th 2013 at 19:04:15

Message Thread

I have a totally serious question for everyone. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 18:31:58
- As long as we hit the Magic 40pt Mark before the last 5 games of the season, I'll be happy (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 29, 19:06:58
  - 21 points from 14 games, possible but unlikley. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:11:53
- From this half of the season, we should have had six more points than we currently do. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 29, 19:04:15
  - But on the other hand.... (NCFC) - Huge Small, Dec 29, 19:08:56
    - both are fair comments. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:13:34
- top 10 given the standard of other teams (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 18:58:08
  - Vet (n/m) (NCFC) - andross, Dec 29, 23:08:12
    - *vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - andross, Dec 29, 23:08:41
  - 10th-12th is a realistic expectation IMHO (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:15:49
    - yes too many below par games (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 19:20:03
  - ^^^ this is the important point (NCFC) - talbotsunbeamer, Dec 29, 19:09:30
- 14th would be ok..... Prefer 11-14th BUT with more points and a bigger (NCFC) - admckechnie, Dec 29, 18:58:03
  - In all reality if we had 3 more points it would look very comfy. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:16:50
- obviously in the top four (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Dec 29, 18:53:30
  - Without mega rich owners we will almost certainly always..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:18:18
- a few more points at a minimum would be ace. maybe 22 (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 18:46:19
  - If we did beat palace the table would look a lot better. No doubt (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:19:16
- My Objective Good Luck/Bad Luck Table of Tilt states the fact that we should have 3 more p (NCFC) - Huge Small, Dec 29, 18:44:34
- Where we are (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 29, 18:39:58
  - Set to finish on 38 points... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 18:46:46
- 2nd worst goals against, 4th worst goals for (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 29, 18:38:22
  - distribution is important. we have also kept some clean sheets (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 18:43:25
    - Understand, but the fact remains, we are not very good (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 29, 18:46:32
      - "recipe for success"....that was the question you didnt answer (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:10:51
        
        Realistic success? Not just looking at the players but how (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 29, 19:31:36
- Anywhere between 9th and 15th but (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 29, 18:35:37
  - To be fair that could still happen but... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 18:40:40
    - Yes and if we are one of them we are screwed (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 29, 19:26:45
      - maybe , maybe not..... some of those teams might be on the beach or...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:45:01
- mid-table with a handful morepoints and not bricking it at the thought of Palarse away (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Dec 29, 18:34:08
  - yes thats reasonable, IMHO we should be in a slightly better position but..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 18:44:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.