I have a totally serious question for everyone.

We currently sit in 14th place in the table. There is obviously a lot of debate about our position and the style of football we play.

Based on the fact we have spent some decent money on players over the past 2 years, where should we realistically be in the table?
(Also take into account that other sides have spent quite a bit of money also which negates our quality edge.)

Posted By: usacanary on December 29th 2013 at 18:31:58

Message Thread

I have a totally serious question for everyone. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 18:31:58
- As long as we hit the Magic 40pt Mark before the last 5 games of the season, I'll be happy (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Dec 29, 19:06:58
  - 21 points from 14 games, possible but unlikley. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:11:53
- From this half of the season, we should have had six more points than we currently do. (NCFC) - tim berry, Dec 29, 19:04:15
  - But on the other hand.... (NCFC) - Huge Small, Dec 29, 19:08:56
    - both are fair comments. (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:13:34
- top 10 given the standard of other teams (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 18:58:08
  - Vet (n/m) (NCFC) - andross, Dec 29, 23:08:12
    - *vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - andross, Dec 29, 23:08:41
  - 10th-12th is a realistic expectation IMHO (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:15:49
    - yes too many below par games (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 29, 19:20:03
  - ^^^ this is the important point (NCFC) - talbotsunbeamer, Dec 29, 19:09:30
- 14th would be ok..... Prefer 11-14th BUT with more points and a bigger (NCFC) - admckechnie, Dec 29, 18:58:03
  - In all reality if we had 3 more points it would look very comfy. (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:16:50
- obviously in the top four (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Dec 29, 18:53:30
  - Without mega rich owners we will almost certainly always..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:18:18
- a few more points at a minimum would be ace. maybe 22 (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 18:46:19
  - If we did beat palace the table would look a lot better. No doubt (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:19:16
- My Objective Good Luck/Bad Luck Table of Tilt states the fact that we should have 3 more p (NCFC) - Huge Small, Dec 29, 18:44:34
- Where we are (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Dec 29, 18:39:58
  - Set to finish on 38 points... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 29, 18:46:46
- 2nd worst goals against, 4th worst goals for (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 29, 18:38:22
  - distribution is important. we have also kept some clean sheets (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 18:43:25
    - Understand, but the fact remains, we are not very good (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 29, 18:46:32
      - "recipe for success"....that was the question you didnt answer (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:10:51
        
        Realistic success? Not just looking at the players but how (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Dec 29, 19:31:36
- Anywhere between 9th and 15th but (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 29, 18:35:37
  - To be fair that could still happen but... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 18:40:40
    - Yes and if we are one of them we are screwed (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 29, 19:26:45
      - maybe , maybe not..... some of those teams might be on the beach or...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 19:45:01
- mid-table with a handful morepoints and not bricking it at the thought of Palarse away (n/m) (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Dec 29, 18:34:08
  - yes thats reasonable, IMHO we should be in a slightly better position but..... (NCFC) - usacanary, Dec 29, 18:44:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.