yeah i think so, i suppose some would argue that elmander would give us an out ball as he'
s got an aerial presence but i think I'd rather have him as an impact sub. ATM, hopefully hooper and rvw will click.
Posted By: protheroe fitzgibbon on December 26th 2013 at 13:22:24
Message Thread
- Presume most would want to see this line-up? (NCFC) - Dog, Dec 26, 13:16:46
- Yep that'd be my side (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Dec 26, 13:32:47
- yeah i think so, i suppose some would argue that elmander would give us an out ball as he' (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Dec 26, 13:22:24
- Dunno. Neither fer nor howson are great at sitting back. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Dec 26, 13:22:14
- I'd like to see Redmond Snodgrass & Fer rotate their 3 positions throughout the game (NCFC) - Fozzie, Dec 26, 13:20:31
- deffo Redmond and Snod (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 13:24:57
- In the absence of Pilks, that's our strongest line up IMO (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Dec 26, 13:18:06
- Not sure about the balance there (NCFC) - norway, Dec 26, 13:26:01
- nah, 4-4-2 seems the way forward right (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 26, 14:01:23
- Not sure about the balance there (NCFC) - norway, Dec 26, 13:26:01
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.