i dont think they were clear chances - Wrath of the Barclay

i dont think they were clear chances

as they were under quite heavy pressure. Anyway, it's only a matter of perspective - they've had two much better chances in the second half already.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on December 7th 2013 at 16:09:32

Message Thread

Well done City, that will do. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 7, 15:46:35
- Yep, I'll take that. Given them too much of the ball; but can't argue with 1-0 (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Dec 7, 15:48:19
- Look fine on the ball (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 7, 15:48:13
  - Yeah (NCFC) - Sanity, Dec 7, 15:51:02
- need to defend better (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 7, 15:47:11
  - would take conceding zero again in the second half (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 7, 15:47:43
    - yes still need to defend better (NCFC) - SCC 28, Dec 7, 15:49:07
      - could be better, but they've mostly just had half chances (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 7, 15:49:48
        
        Apart from the three clear chances I can think of off the top of my head... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Dec 7, 15:55:38
        
        they didn't.. just a couple of half chances. (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 7, 15:57:38
        
        They did... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Dec 7, 16:03:22
        
        name them (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 7, 16:04:55
        
        Both of which were clear chances - corners count - and when they walked it thru us... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Dec 7, 16:07:52
        
        i dont think they were clear chances (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 7, 16:09:32
- yep, excellent half (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 7, 15:47:08

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.