...but his argument is closer to the truth than yours

our form was still decent at the time and we were capable of getting results against good teams.

Which again, is my point. We were still decent at that time, certainly better than we are now.

By trying to compare our situation from the to now is silly because our general form and performances from then would have kept us up comfortably, whereas our current ones wouldn't

His point still stands.

Posted By: Common Sense Police on December 5th 2013 at 01:48:38

Message Thread

FAO mecagoenti (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Dec 5, 00:08:38
- Not really sure what those results are supposed to show (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:12:29
  - I'm not sure we're "comfortably clear"... (NCFC) - yellowman, Dec 5, 00:48:29
  - Oh no we can't. And we've already played our easiest home game of the season (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Dec 5, 00:19:22
    - by the same token (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:21:24
      - 1 away win last season from those sides 'around us' (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:30:54
  - We seem to get more than our share of humpings (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Dec 5, 00:14:58
    - about the same as under lambert (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:16:05
      - Yep, I was DEVASTATED by our performance in drawing 3-3 at Arsenal (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Dec 5, 00:20:37
        
        beat spurs (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 00:31:06
        
        In our last ten games of that season we gained 11 points (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 00:39:35
        
        well bigfeller is pointing to that (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 00:53:42
        
        It doesn't really undermine his point when our worst form under Lambert (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 00:59:01
        
        FFS (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 01:17:07
        
        Are you thick? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 01:19:13
        
        that was not the point I made (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 01:22:20
        
        ...but it was the point I made (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 01:26:40
        
        show me where (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 01:30:46
        
        You pointed out some shit performances and results (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 01:37:25
        
        again (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 01:43:49
        
        ...but his argument is closer to the truth than yours (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 01:48:38
        
        again (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 01:43:38
        
        depends if you think the manager is taking us forwards or backwards (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:56:46
        
        a 'relatively' poor end of season (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:33:17
        
        what about getting hammered 3-0 at sunderland (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:22:15
        
        you mean when we were 'on the beach' safe... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:31:29
        
        We only really got hammered a couple of times under Lambert (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 00:28:35
        
        the Lambert side in 11/12 (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 00:37:40
        
        Arguably better resources? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 00:42:56
        
        Lambert has spent more than Hughton (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 01:04:53
        
        Again, you ignore the fact that Lambert took over a side that finished with 38 points (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 01:12:04
        
        I ignore it (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 01:21:16
        
        ...but I'm not ignoring that... (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 01:24:44
        
        I do not believe (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Dec 5, 01:47:11
        
        I hope you're correct (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 01:49:14
        
        Or indeed Lambert's positive mentality affecting the squad (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:41:15
        
        Hughton at Norwich has almost an identical net spend as Lambert at Villa (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:38:44
        
        and have had more 0-0s than we have this season (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:38:25
        
        We have the worst goals conceded tally in the league right now (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:39:37
        
        well. this investment thing is a red herring (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:31:24
        
        So by that token all of the other teams at our level and below should be tonked regularly (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 00:34:47
        
        well no.. all I'm saying is that the fact we have spent 30m (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:36:55
        
        Well, some teams at our level have spent a little more, most the same, some less... (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 00:40:42
        
        we've only been thrashed twice this season (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:42:44
        
        Arsenal as well... (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 00:44:41
        
        I think Arsenal was different.. certainly not a thrashing (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:46:19
        
        Yes Thrashings can happen when you choose to have a go a 2-0 down (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:47:41
        
        Like when we chose to accept defeat at White Hart Lane (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:48:20
        
        4-1 is not a thrashing? Standards have certainly fallen... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:43:50
        
        and how many more rubbish sides are there? (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:32:07
        
        When we were already safe in mid-table, and cruising in having basically secured safety by (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Dec 5, 00:26:43
        
        so you preferred the style of play under Lambert (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Dec 5, 00:35:00
        
        The main reason we will stay up this season, is three crap sides got promoted (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 5, 00:34:05

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.