well, the table you just linked to

(which I'm not sure is accurate), suggests that Southampton, Spurs, Stoke and Villa have all spent over double what we have.

Not really an even footing.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on November 24th 2013 at 14:35:19

Message Thread

Looks like our 7-0 wasn't that bad (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 24, 14:08:26
- just like when we were battered under Lambert (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 14:13:00
  - Of course Lambert didn't spend 30 million on the squad (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:14:35
    - But he did on Villa's (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 14:32:06
      - And beat them twice (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Nov 24, 14:42:17
        
        but of course, our victory against them doesn't count (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:44:51
        
        It shows we should be a top 6 side really (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 24, 14:45:47
        
        so villa should be a top 2 side then? Lambert failing badly? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 15:00:25
        
        VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 24, 15:08:03
        
        Zing!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 24, 14:44:49
      - A different team. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:33:31
        
        Funny how you fuck off for 2 weeks, and come back being a massive prick (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 14:37:56
        
        I'd ask you to not reply to me again, but you're so mental, you just can't help yourself (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 14:38:47
        
        I agree, it is difficult not to respond to your biased twaddle. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:42:21
    - but Man City have spent 100m on their squad - so should have improved more than us (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:17:30
      - millions of quids worth of players have left man city in the same time frame (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:24:50
        
        Here you go: Norwich City: 8th highest net spenders over the last 5 years (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:25:18
        
        or not, wrong wenlink... That one is 7th highest net spender this season. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:26:51
        
        who is first? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:27:08
        
        who cares? we are mid table in spenders, not relegation fodder. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:29:09
        
        and three points off midtable (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 24, 16:09:40
        
        and 1 point off the drop zone... fine lines and all that (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 17:03:11
        
        NCFC: 12th highest net spenders of the current PL sides, over 5 seasons. (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:28:34
        
        with 8 teams net spends less overall. (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:41:38
        
        and three of the teams below us are Arsenal, Spurs and Everton (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:30:48
        
        I am saying, all this talk of other teams spending is irrelevant (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:32:38
        
        well, the table you just linked to (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:35:19
        
        sunderland.. not spurs (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:35:45
      - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 24, 14:20:40
- Agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 24, 14:12:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.