but Man City have spent 100m on their squad - so should have improved more than us

only spending 30m in the same time.

#phrankinlogic

Posted By: Mecagoenti on November 24th 2013 at 14:17:30

Message Thread

Looks like our 7-0 wasn't that bad (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 24, 14:08:26
- just like when we were battered under Lambert (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 14:13:00
  - Of course Lambert didn't spend 30 million on the squad (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:14:35
    - But he did on Villa's (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 14:32:06
      - And beat them twice (n/m) (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Nov 24, 14:42:17
        
        but of course, our victory against them doesn't count (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:44:51
        
        It shows we should be a top 6 side really (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 24, 14:45:47
        
        so villa should be a top 2 side then? Lambert failing badly? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 15:00:25
        
        VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 24, 15:08:03
        
        Zing!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 24, 14:44:49
      - A different team. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:33:31
        
        Funny how you fuck off for 2 weeks, and come back being a massive prick (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 14:37:56
        
        I'd ask you to not reply to me again, but you're so mental, you just can't help yourself (NCFC) - pants, Nov 24, 14:38:47
        
        I agree, it is difficult not to respond to your biased twaddle. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:42:21
    - but Man City have spent 100m on their squad - so should have improved more than us (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:17:30
      - millions of quids worth of players have left man city in the same time frame (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:24:50
        
        Here you go: Norwich City: 8th highest net spenders over the last 5 years (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:25:18
        
        or not, wrong wenlink... That one is 7th highest net spender this season. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:26:51
        
        who is first? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:27:08
        
        who cares? we are mid table in spenders, not relegation fodder. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:29:09
        
        and three points off midtable (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 24, 16:09:40
        
        and 1 point off the drop zone... fine lines and all that (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 17:03:11
        
        NCFC: 12th highest net spenders of the current PL sides, over 5 seasons. (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:28:34
        
        with 8 teams net spends less overall. (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:41:38
        
        and three of the teams below us are Arsenal, Spurs and Everton (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:30:48
        
        I am saying, all this talk of other teams spending is irrelevant (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 24, 14:32:38
        
        well, the table you just linked to (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:35:19
        
        sunderland.. not spurs (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Nov 24, 14:35:45
      - lol (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 24, 14:20:40
- Agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 24, 14:12:45

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.