Back in our Dark Ages I used to get caught up in all the "when should he go" and
"who should replace him" stuff
But that was because I had very little faith in the people running the club and making the decisions
Now I do, so I'm pretty chilled. McNasty and Co aren't infallible, but they're pretty bloody good and they can be ruthless when they think it necessary. So I'm just waiting on them, really
Posted By: Old Git on October 30th 2013 at 13:08:36
Message Thread
- Back in our Dark Ages I used to get caught up in all the "when should he go" and (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 30, 13:08:36
- They've made 2 appointments, 1 good in Lambert, but you don't agree with this one? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 13:13:25
- clearly the decision to appoint Hughton was a good one. (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 30, 13:16:51
- It's more like 1 great decision, one not too bad (NCFC) - bjg123, Oct 30, 13:15:37
- ^^ this ^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Oct 30, 13:17:04
- oh, have they made a decision to sack hughton then? (NCFC) - Tombs, Oct 30, 13:14:19
- Yep, thsi. Especially as they are the only ones who can make the decision and have (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 30, 13:12:11
- potd (NCFC) - Tombs, Oct 30, 13:10:06
- Yes. Makes the wroth awfully tedious though. (NCFC) - Old Man, Oct 30, 13:10:04
- twas always thus. (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Oct 30, 13:12:31
- That's a very fair assessment tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Oct 30, 13:09:55
- They've made 2 appointments, 1 good in Lambert, but you don't agree with this one? (NCFC) - pants, Oct 30, 13:13:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.