One area I'm really struggling to understand
is the fans annoyance yesterday at the substitutions...why on earth would any manager have changed the formation yesterday in a game we were dominating to such a huge extent? Personally I do think Redmond should have come on earlier and maybe Hooper should have stayed on but that's about it. There's no doubt Hughton is dividing the fans but be careful what we wish for...we could end up with a lot lot worse.
Posted By: BINMEN8R on October 27th 2013 at 14:38:23
Message Thread
- One area I'm really struggling to understand (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 14:38:23
- Spot on!! (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 27, 15:48:57
- ^^ VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Oct 27, 14:48:32
- Which was supposed to be in reply to Colney Rodent (n/m) (NCFC) - Klobo04, Oct 27, 14:51:55
- There are a couple of answera to this in my opinion (NCFC) - Colney Rodent, Oct 27, 14:47:09
- ^ spot on (unfortunately) (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 14:50:35
- Our general poor form is more 'spot on' if you ask me (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 27, 14:57:52
- I don't see we're that far away from having a good team and establishing ourselves (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 15:03:29
- why would being in the bottom 3 ever be called brilliant?! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 15:09:24
- Because it isn't (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 15:10:50
- so it isn't (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 15:11:19
- thanks for pointing out it isn't brilliant then (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 15:14:20
- glad to help (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 15:15:02
- thanks for pointing out it isn't brilliant then (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 15:14:20
- so it isn't (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 15:11:19
- Because it isn't (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 15:10:50
- ^^^vmt^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 15:05:56
- why would being in the bottom 3 ever be called brilliant?! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 15:09:24
- I don't see we're that far away from having a good team and establishing ourselves (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 15:03:29
- Our general poor form is more 'spot on' if you ask me (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 27, 14:57:52
- no possible other answers apart from fan arrogance or intransigence (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 27, 14:50:19
- No I don't think there's any validity..none whatsoever. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 14:53:18
- so how few wins would make you concerned? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 14:54:51
- Yes if course that would stupid thing to say. But a great (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 14:59:31
- Correct! (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 27, 15:50:02
- Yes if course that would stupid thing to say. But a great (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 14:59:31
- then things must be bewildering to you then (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 27, 14:54:25
- so how few wins would make you concerned? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 14:54:51
- No I don't think there's any validity..none whatsoever. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 14:53:18
- ^ spot on (unfortunately) (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 27, 14:50:35
- you have just agreed with two annoyances then. Not too difficult to understand then (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 27, 14:40:34
- But they booed cos they wanted 2 strikers and wanted (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 14:46:21
- I can't predict what others are thinking, but I do believe he isn't great at subs (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Oct 27, 14:47:47
- But they booed cos they wanted 2 strikers and wanted (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 14:46:21
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.