I think Hoots is very much a hold what you have

Which disappointed me today. We were on top, but in my opinion we needed something slightly different. We may have risked losing our midfield superiority, we may have won. Who knows.

Posted By: 51eve on October 26th 2013 at 20:21:59

Message Thread

Didn't watch the game today, sounds like we were much the better team? (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 26, 20:06:04
- Poor finishing combined with over reliance on long rangers plus a couple quality saves (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Oct 26, 20:16:38
- Played really well in the first half, it was like the alamo at times (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 26, 20:14:15
  - Basically comes down to Hoots having very little in the way of a plan b. (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Oct 26, 20:16:12
- we dominated and could have won by 2or3. (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Oct 26, 20:12:25
  - Just imagine if we had the confidence to play Rvw and hooper on the pitch at the same time (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Oct 26, 20:14:46
  - we've won 6 in 30 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 20:14:43
    - we've also won 4 in 11 (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:16:14
      - Winning 4 in 11 is the best spin you can put on our form (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 26, 20:23:34
        
        not denying that.. but 6 in 30 is the worst spin you could put on our results (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:25:15
        
        SCC is the most negative spin doctor on here though tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 26, 21:13:42
      - 2 against teams who didn't care (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 20:22:22
      - Just goes to show you can manipulate stats to prove any argument (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 26, 20:19:56
        
        what does it prove? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 20:23:10
        
        so why not give the stats for the last 40 games then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:24:39
        
        because that's what the happy clappers do (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 20:27:40
        
        weak post (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:28:50
        
        exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:20:47
        
        2 in 9 is the more relevant figure (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 26, 20:22:00
- We played well, especially first half (NCFC) - 51eve, Oct 26, 20:09:36
  - if we are, in your words, so clearly on top of the game, (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:17:54
    - I think Hoots is very much a hold what you have (NCFC) - 51eve, Oct 26, 20:21:59
- Too much booing going on (NCFC) - Waddockhunt, Oct 26, 20:08:28

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.