we dominated and could have won by 2or3.

We attacked and played on the front foot. On a different day we would have got the points.
Some people seem to believe we should win every game and that the cash we spent shiuld guarantee safety. Our team needed a whole new front line and we spent less than some teams spent on one player.
One win and we are mid table.

Posted By: Joe Strimmer on October 26th 2013 at 20:12:25

Message Thread

Didn't watch the game today, sounds like we were much the better team? (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 26, 20:06:04
- Poor finishing combined with over reliance on long rangers plus a couple quality saves (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Oct 26, 20:16:38
- Played really well in the first half, it was like the alamo at times (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 26, 20:14:15
  - Basically comes down to Hoots having very little in the way of a plan b. (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Oct 26, 20:16:12
- we dominated and could have won by 2or3. (NCFC) - Joe Strimmer, Oct 26, 20:12:25
  - Just imagine if we had the confidence to play Rvw and hooper on the pitch at the same time (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Oct 26, 20:14:46
  - we've won 6 in 30 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 20:14:43
    - we've also won 4 in 11 (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:16:14
      - Winning 4 in 11 is the best spin you can put on our form (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 26, 20:23:34
        
        not denying that.. but 6 in 30 is the worst spin you could put on our results (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:25:15
        
        SCC is the most negative spin doctor on here though tbf (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 26, 21:13:42
      - 2 against teams who didn't care (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 20:22:22
      - Just goes to show you can manipulate stats to prove any argument (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Oct 26, 20:19:56
        
        what does it prove? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 20:23:10
        
        so why not give the stats for the last 40 games then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:24:39
        
        because that's what the happy clappers do (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 26, 20:27:40
        
        weak post (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:28:50
        
        exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:20:47
        
        2 in 9 is the more relevant figure (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Oct 26, 20:22:00
- We played well, especially first half (NCFC) - 51eve, Oct 26, 20:09:36
  - if we are, in your words, so clearly on top of the game, (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Oct 26, 20:17:54
    - I think Hoots is very much a hold what you have (NCFC) - 51eve, Oct 26, 20:21:59
- Too much booing going on (NCFC) - Waddockhunt, Oct 26, 20:08:28

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.