no, fair, the same had occurred to me, which is why arrows denoting areas of resonsibility

would help my case.

I also acknowledge that maybe neither Cafu nor Whitts would have the pace to cover a pacy winger: but then I'm not suggesting we'd play it against everybody.

Posted By: Sugbad The Bad on October 20th 2013 at 09:11:16

Message Thread

3 5 2... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 20, 08:41:00
- also I would guess olsson and whittaker are ideal for the. . (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 20, 08:43:11
  - I just think 3 5 2 would be a better option... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 20, 09:16:34
  - I suggested a new formation a while back but nobody was impressed (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Oct 20, 08:57:47
    - I would guess the prevailing opinion would be... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 20, 09:08:00
      - no, fair, the same had occurred to me, which is why arrows denoting areas of resonsibility (NCFC) - Sugbad The Bad, Oct 20, 09:11:16
- cant see snods or martin being dropped... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Oct 20, 08:43:09
  - it's a hardeone as we've not been awfup the last.. (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 20, 08:44:58
    - some players stepping up is why we haven't been awful (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 20, 08:52:32
      - indeed, but as I say the real test will be next week. What's your... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 20, 09:09:52
        
        would rather we just played our form players (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 20, 09:17:23
        
        we can't start with just 5 players though. ;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - avid_canary, Oct 20, 09:28:18

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.