Replying up here

The last big ones I can think of - in the old era (pre May 2009) was Cullumgate but didn?t that one fall into their lap?

In the new era, there was that story about the US investor who was interested (late 2009) and the author ended up spending some time on the NCFC naughty step.

Posted By: KentonCanary on October 14th 2013 at 14:08:24

Message Thread

Official NCFC twitter feed now answering tweets directed to McNally (NCFC) - norway, Oct 14, 13:40:11
- all very bizarre (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 14, 13:42:35
  - It may be nothing (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 14, 13:52:17
    - a bit odd that he told people the other week (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 14, 13:54:54
  - I've done an open tweet to @pinkun (NCFC) - norway, Oct 14, 13:50:03
    - would be their first piece of actual journalism (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 14, 13:51:35
      - Harsh. Will leave others to judge of the fairness (n/m) (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Oct 14, 13:54:57
        
        i don't mean blog entries but actual news stuff (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 14, 13:55:51
        
        Yes. And I wonder how many actual stories have they really broken? (n/m) (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Oct 14, 13:57:25
        
        I hate it when a post doesn't post (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 14, 14:00:12
        
        Replying up here (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Oct 14, 14:08:24
        
        Yeah - there's always that sense that if Archant step out of line (NCFC) - norway, Oct 14, 14:10:59
        
        And now scc is replying doen there FFS. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Oct 14, 14:01:45
        
        yep (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 14, 14:03:21
        
        Oh, it did post, in the wrong place (NCFC) - duke of york, Oct 14, 14:00:44

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.