but that's just it, they don't just penalise what they see

because most of it at corners is blatant and can clearly be seen. Agree that it was daft of Fer but the rule either has to be applied every time or not at all. Some are difficult to see but the majority at corners and free kicks into the box aren't.

Posted By: Chopper on September 30th 2013 at 08:28:27

Message Thread

The analysis about the Fer shirt holding irritates! (NCFC) - Chopper, Sep 30, 08:06:00
- Ryan Bennett still holding his opponent's shirt at set pieces. Dangerous game! (NCFC) - JD3, Sep 30, 09:04:07
- Why would it annoy you? (NCFC) - Charles21, Sep 30, 09:00:15
- MOTD admitted that it would have been a soft penalty. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Sep 30, 08:54:38
- No mention of RVW being held before Bennett hit the bar, just as much of a penalty. (n/m) (NCFC) - 51eve, Sep 30, 08:51:58
  - Yep, had his arm round his neck! (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Sep 30, 09:43:53
- they can only penalise what they see (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 30, 08:12:08
  - but that's just it, they don't just penalise what they see (NCFC) - Chopper, Sep 30, 08:28:27
    - crowded penalty areas always difficult (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 30, 08:31:26
      - video refs would probably be a nightmare (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 30, 08:41:12
        
        yeah would need an appeals procedure (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 30, 08:48:19
        
        sounds a bit like tennis (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 30, 09:26:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.