Just that the ?100m v ?28m is slightly specious
Our net spend is higher than Spurs'.
Clearly they have bought some bloody brilliant players though, no doubt about that.
Posted By: norway on September 14th 2013 at 16:03:17
Message Thread
- Negative tactics not to blaim today... (NCFC) - oli470, Sep 14, 15:54:41
- ht ?100m 1-0 ?28m (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 14, 15:55:48
- Only a ?100m? Was thinking maybe 200m (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 14, 16:02:29
- and a player sale of 100 million. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 14, 16:03:25
- what was hull about then? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 14, 15:59:56
- Not sure the money argument stacks up. (NCFC) - norway, Sep 14, 15:57:28
- What on earth is the relevance of that??? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 14, 15:59:03
- it means they sold first team players (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 14, 16:04:15
- last season's best prem player no less (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 14, 16:05:09
- Just that the ?100m v ?28m is slightly specious (NCFC) - norway, Sep 14, 16:03:17
- it means they sold first team players (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 14, 16:04:15
- What on earth is the relevance of that??? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Sep 14, 15:59:03
- Only a ?100m? Was thinking maybe 200m (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Sep 14, 16:02:29
- ht ?100m 1-0 ?28m (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 14, 15:55:48
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.