They've spent very little so far. Fulham are being sold so that's pretty understandable.
And Stoke have been big spenders for years so probably need their new manager to work out who he wants to keep before splurging.
Posted By: trafford_canary on July 25th 2013 at 12:07:01
Message Thread
- What happened to prudence? If we sign Quags we would have spent $37.M (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jul 25, 11:53:14
- Probably nearer to ?28-?30M...RVW was last year, so ?20M this years money (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Jul 25, 12:44:15
- RVW was last years money and I reckon you've inflated those prices. (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jul 25, 12:04:36
- Is prudent investment when Sky pay us ?60M per year. (NCFC) - pab, Jul 25, 11:56:09
- I'm just surprised other clubs havent done it as well. Fulham, Stoke etc spent very little (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jul 25, 12:03:07
- They've spent very little so far. Fulham are being sold so that's pretty understandable. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jul 25, 12:07:01
- stoke have spent shitloads in the past (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 25, 12:05:23
- I'm just surprised other clubs havent done it as well. Fulham, Stoke etc spent very little (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jul 25, 12:03:07
- if that's meant to be quid, quags would be just over 8 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 25, 11:55:12
- $$$$$$$$$$$$$ = pounds FFS! (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jul 25, 11:53:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.