Is prudent investment when Sky pay us ?60M per year.
No debts. Better to spend it on players than a new City Stand.
Posted By: pab on July 25th 2013 at 11:56:09
Message Thread
- What happened to prudence? If we sign Quags we would have spent $37.M (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jul 25, 11:53:14
- Probably nearer to ?28-?30M...RVW was last year, so ?20M this years money (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Jul 25, 12:44:15
- RVW was last years money and I reckon you've inflated those prices. (n/m) (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jul 25, 12:04:36
- Is prudent investment when Sky pay us ?60M per year. (NCFC) - pab, Jul 25, 11:56:09
- I'm just surprised other clubs havent done it as well. Fulham, Stoke etc spent very little (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jul 25, 12:03:07
- They've spent very little so far. Fulham are being sold so that's pretty understandable. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, Jul 25, 12:07:01
- stoke have spent shitloads in the past (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 25, 12:05:23
- I'm just surprised other clubs havent done it as well. Fulham, Stoke etc spent very little (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jul 25, 12:03:07
- if that's meant to be quid, quags would be just over 8 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jul 25, 11:55:12
- $$$$$$$$$$$$$ = pounds FFS! (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jul 25, 11:53:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.