I would like to formally register my strong disagreement with that
but we should probably agree to disagree and end it there, 'cos there really is no way of ever settling this one.
Posted By: Tricky Hawes on July 17th 2013 at 10:06:02
Message Thread
- Possibly a reflection of my nerdiness (and age), but I really enjoyed this (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 17, 08:57:31
- It may be apocryphal now. but I seem to remember KK saving a penalty against Birmingham (NCFC) - shortfatb, Jul 17, 10:35:11
- Did he put the ball down and they scored? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 17, 10:52:23
- Me too and slimmer (n/m) (NCFC) - shortfatb, Jul 17, 10:58:52
- Did he put the ball down and they scored? (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 17, 10:52:23
- what was it we used to sing (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Jul 17, 09:12:04
- There's no way Keelan was better than Ruddy (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 17, 09:45:24
- I would like to formally register my strong disagreement with that (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 17, 10:06:02
- Me too! (NCFC) - Highlander, Jul 17, 11:34:39
- Keelan would have been better with gloves (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 17, 09:52:44
- I would like to formally register my strong disagreement with that (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 17, 10:06:02
- There's no way Keelan was better than Ruddy (NCFC) - Old Git, Jul 17, 09:45:24
- Thankyou! (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jul 17, 09:06:49
- ha, yes. Although not sure I completely remember how it worked... (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 17, 09:11:31
- Something Like... (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jul 17, 09:15:18
- weren't 4 and 5 the centre halves rather than 5 and 6? (NCFC) - paulg, Jul 17, 09:54:16
- Some were - 4, 5 and 6 were sometimes switched about (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 17, 09:57:53
- Remember That Great Leeds Side (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jul 17, 10:04:18
- Yes, the no.9 was always the big man (NCFC) - paulg, Jul 17, 10:20:47
- Watson and Walford. 5 & 6. Nuff said. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 17, 10:04:12
- Didn't Bruce wear 4? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 17, 10:57:38
- Remember That Great Leeds Side (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jul 17, 10:04:18
- Some were - 4, 5 and 6 were sometimes switched about (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Jul 17, 09:57:53
- Oh, 8 was the other striker was he? Yep, think you're right (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 17, 09:18:20
- 1-11 was from the old "W" formation (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Jul 17, 09:24:19
- Remember these from the 70's, some of the kids at school had them also (NCFC) - BSE Canary, Jul 17, 10:29:36
- 1-11 was from the old "W" formation (NCFC) - ghostof barry butler, Jul 17, 09:24:19
- weren't 4 and 5 the centre halves rather than 5 and 6? (NCFC) - paulg, Jul 17, 09:54:16
- Something Like... (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jul 17, 09:15:18
- ha, yes. Although not sure I completely remember how it worked... (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 17, 09:11:31
- It may be apocryphal now. but I seem to remember KK saving a penalty against Birmingham (NCFC) - shortfatb, Jul 17, 10:35:11
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.