Van Ginkel season long loan
and ?7.5m with Ruddy going the other way.
Would you take it?
McCarthy or Forster for ?5 plus a Dutch contingent of RVW, Fer and Van Ginkel.
I'd be more than happy with this outcome.
Posted By: Rusty Steele on July 5th 2013 at 21:06:11
Message Thread
- Van Ginkel season long loan (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:06:11
- no, not a chance (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Jul 5, 21:14:48
- Know we don't need to but (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:26:38
- Someone needs to follow Ruddy around shouting 'STEVE SIDWELL' all day (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jul 5, 21:17:57
- You're forgetting that Ruddy will have the ultimate say here. His choice, not Chelsea's... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:16:34
- Not really though, is it? (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jul 5, 21:20:46
- Ha. Tru dat. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:24:02
- I reckon he`s got more sense than to go there. (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Jul 5, 21:19:34
- Not really though, is it? (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jul 5, 21:20:46
- This notion that Chelsea will just loan out their new player is just bizarre.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:11:43
- Not really - they did it with De Bruyne and Courtois (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Jul 6, 01:14:11
- so you think he'll be a regular in their midfield this season? (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:20:58
- Erm, did I say that? (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:23:23
- He had a good season and was in the fringes of the full squad (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:30:30
- If I wanted to take a chance and play regular football, I wouldn't have signed for Chelsea (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:34:44
- Maybe not (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:35:55
- Yes, it says less likely to be a loan... you've made my point for me... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:37:21
- Maybe not (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:35:55
- Speculation that Mourinho actually has given the player assurances (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:34:31
- So... even less chance of them letting their new starlet out to okay for someone else then (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:35:39
- yes agreed. So we're both wide of the mark if, indeed, the article is to be believed (n/m) (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:38:05
- And my question was hypothetical (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:41:44
- so...for clarity... (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:46:33
- lol....okay.... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:42:36
- Erm, my point was it was absurd to think of him as a loan target - you've made my point... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:39:38
- And my question was hypothetical (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:41:44
- As that article also speculates. No loan... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:36:24
- yes agreed. So we're both wide of the mark if, indeed, the article is to be believed (n/m) (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:38:05
- So... even less chance of them letting their new starlet out to okay for someone else then (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:35:39
- If I wanted to take a chance and play regular football, I wouldn't have signed for Chelsea (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:34:44
- He had a good season and was in the fringes of the full squad (NCFC) - Rusty Steele, Jul 5, 21:30:30
- Erm, did I say that? (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jul 5, 21:23:23
- Don't think we should give them our best talent in exchange for training their new ones (n/m) (NCFC) - Fozzie, Jul 5, 21:10:36
- no, not a chance (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Jul 5, 21:14:48
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.