yep no denying the results were good

i woudn't say his performances were

only so long you can do well with a liability between the sticks

and then the vile run started

i suppose a case can be made that hoot went ultra defensive because of who we had in goal

when ruddy came back there was a freedom

Posted By: SCC 28 on June 28th 2013 at 11:47:09

Message Thread

Would hoots go with bunn (NCFC) - Kojo, Jun 28, 09:48:39
- Our results with Bunn in goal were awful (NCFC) - Ben, Jun 28, 10:05:09
  - I thought that, and looked it up a couple of weeks back. I seem to remember that the (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:21:45
    - cos we were scoring for fun (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:25:12
      - "Scoring for fun: 2 against Sunderland" (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:26:37
        
        yes in comparison to what we did in the new year! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:31:22
        
        Can't really blame that on Bunn (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:32:36
        
        but we can blame our defensive set up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:37:58
        
        In his first 8 games (5 wins, 2 draws) we only ONCE scored more than 2 (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:27:20
        
        you can't include the 3 league cups games lol (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:35:31
        
        Why not ? OK, league cup games out. Undefeated in his first 5 games. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:41:56
        
        yep no denying the results were good (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:47:09
    - Hare gew: (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:24:01
  - Bunn can't dive, just throws himslef on the floor. Even Suarez is better at diving (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jun 28, 11:08:54
  - Against a WBA with nothing to play for (NCFC) - Kojo, Jun 28, 10:06:50
    - That doesn't change the fact Bunn let in many goals Ruddy would have saved (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Jun 28, 10:13:11
    - the same man city who have scored in every home league game (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 10:13:11
- And the keeper is arguably the single most important player on the pitch! (NCFC) - Rob NCFC, Jun 28, 10:02:06
- If Bunn is our first choice next season (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 28, 10:00:49
- Bunn was not outstanding. A decent backup goalie, but not a Premiership No 1 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 28, 09:58:07
  - outstandingly poor (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 09:59:47
- Not good enough to be No.1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Rob NCFC, Jun 28, 09:57:58
- I think Bunn is a definite no.2, he's not been first choice anywhere he's been... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Jun 28, 09:53:22
- yep let's play a poor champ keeper in the EPL (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 09:51:39
  - Well we did 75% of last season (NCFC) - Kojo, Jun 28, 10:01:56
    - he started just over half (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 10:08:36
    - we stayed up because of the points we got in the other 25% of the season though (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 28, 10:04:50
      - not true (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 28, 10:31:01
        
        and he still dropped clangers in nearly every win (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 10:39:55
        
        go on then, name those clangers. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 28, 11:11:21
        
        sunderland, swansea at least 2, reading (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:16:21
        
        not clangers. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 28, 12:13:44
        
        ok goals we wouldn't have conceded with a half decent keeper (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 12:23:22
- The difference was in his leadership. Ruddy is immense that way (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 09:51:02
  - And his height (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 28, 09:52:29
    - His distribution is poor... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Jun 28, 09:57:25
      - I don't remember his kicking being poor? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kojo, Jun 28, 10:03:26

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.