not true

with Bunn in goal City got 23 pts from 22 games. That equals 40 pts over the season, enough to stay up.

The poor run from West Ham onwards was not his fault; nor did he miss the Soton pen (2 pts dropped) or the 1-on-1 at Sunderland (another 2 pts dropped)

Posted By: Henclrikus on June 28th 2013 at 10:31:01

Message Thread

Would hoots go with bunn (NCFC) - Kojo, Jun 28, 09:48:39
- Our results with Bunn in goal were awful (NCFC) - Ben, Jun 28, 10:05:09
  - I thought that, and looked it up a couple of weeks back. I seem to remember that the (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:21:45
    - cos we were scoring for fun (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:25:12
      - "Scoring for fun: 2 against Sunderland" (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:26:37
        
        yes in comparison to what we did in the new year! (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:31:22
        
        Can't really blame that on Bunn (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:32:36
        
        but we can blame our defensive set up (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:37:58
        
        In his first 8 games (5 wins, 2 draws) we only ONCE scored more than 2 (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:27:20
        
        you can't include the 3 league cups games lol (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:35:31
        
        Why not ? OK, league cup games out. Undefeated in his first 5 games. (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:41:56
        
        yep no denying the results were good (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:47:09
    - Hare gew: (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 11:24:01
  - Bunn can't dive, just throws himslef on the floor. Even Suarez is better at diving (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jun 28, 11:08:54
  - Against a WBA with nothing to play for (NCFC) - Kojo, Jun 28, 10:06:50
    - That doesn't change the fact Bunn let in many goals Ruddy would have saved (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, Jun 28, 10:13:11
    - the same man city who have scored in every home league game (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 10:13:11
- And the keeper is arguably the single most important player on the pitch! (NCFC) - Rob NCFC, Jun 28, 10:02:06
- If Bunn is our first choice next season (NCFC) - duke of york, Jun 28, 10:00:49
- Bunn was not outstanding. A decent backup goalie, but not a Premiership No 1 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jun 28, 09:58:07
  - outstandingly poor (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 09:59:47
- Not good enough to be No.1 (n/m) (NCFC) - Rob NCFC, Jun 28, 09:57:58
- I think Bunn is a definite no.2, he's not been first choice anywhere he's been... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Jun 28, 09:53:22
- yep let's play a poor champ keeper in the EPL (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 09:51:39
  - Well we did 75% of last season (NCFC) - Kojo, Jun 28, 10:01:56
    - he started just over half (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 10:08:36
    - we stayed up because of the points we got in the other 25% of the season though (NCFC) - mr carra, Jun 28, 10:04:50
      - not true (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 28, 10:31:01
        
        and he still dropped clangers in nearly every win (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 10:39:55
        
        go on then, name those clangers. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 28, 11:11:21
        
        sunderland, swansea at least 2, reading (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 11:16:21
        
        not clangers. (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jun 28, 12:13:44
        
        ok goals we wouldn't have conceded with a half decent keeper (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 28, 12:23:22
- The difference was in his leadership. Ruddy is immense that way (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jun 28, 09:51:02
  - And his height (NCFC) - Duck, Jun 28, 09:52:29
    - His distribution is poor... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Jun 28, 09:57:25
      - I don't remember his kicking being poor? (n/m) (NCFC) - Kojo, Jun 28, 10:03:26

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.