Who has said it on here?
...is another way of phrasing a straightforward and reasonable question.
Clearly 99.9% of posters/supporters would think that is a ridiculous position to hold re Hughton.
Posted By: norway on May 15th 2013 at 11:49:36
Message Thread
- Anyone who used us losing in the fa cup under Hughton, as a bench mark to (NCFC) - pants, May 15, 09:28:53
- delusional (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 15, 09:55:44
- Has anyone said that? (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, May 15, 09:46:42
- no (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 15, 09:55:56
- Yes they have, or I wouldn't have made the statements. Trolling to the max guys (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 15, 11:01:09
- Who has said it on here? (NCFC) - norway, May 15, 11:49:36
- You've implied nobody said it. Which is your usual way of starting an argument (NCFC) - pants, May 15, 12:12:07
- You've made a statement which surprises me. (NCFC) - norway, May 15, 12:20:52
- he doesn't want to.... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 15, 12:31:48
- Fair enough. He is right of course... (NCFC) - norway, May 15, 12:53:44
- he doesn't want to.... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 15, 12:31:48
- You've made a statement which surprises me. (NCFC) - norway, May 15, 12:20:52
- You've implied nobody said it. Which is your usual way of starting an argument (NCFC) - pants, May 15, 12:12:07
- Who has said it on here? (NCFC) - norway, May 15, 11:49:36
- Yes they have, or I wouldn't have made the statements. Trolling to the max guys (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 15, 11:01:09
- no (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 15, 09:55:56
- What you mean pants ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, May 15, 09:45:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.