No need to apologise
And no way was my post a sly dig at all.
I spent an hour with the Ware's last night and they were totally in awe of the reception Paul got. I'd have taken a defeat after that to be honest, as football is about far more than the 90 mins on the pitch. Warey was one of us, proper player and a proper person. The sort everyone loves in their colours.
You may have lost the game, but Stoke fans and the Ware family know hay your club is all about, if they didn't before.
Be a pleasure to have a beer with you next season.
Posted By: BunnySCFC on April 28th 2013 at 14:57:59
Message Thread
- Class acts, thank you (NCFC) - BunnySCFC, Apr 28, 11:34:46
- No need to apologise (NCFC) - BunnySCFC, Apr 28, 14:57:59
- Hay? Should say 'what'. nm (n/m) (NCFC) - BunnySCFC, Apr 28, 14:59:08
- Bunny, I'm sorry if was misguided replying to this about yesterdays game (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:59:35
- No 'if' about it. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Apr 28, 14:45:06
- No problem, the least that could have been done. (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Apr 28, 11:54:35
- Your players are a bit dirty aren't they? (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:39:16
- Thanks for reiterating what classy fans we have by having a sly dig ... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Apr 28, 11:48:54
- Thanks for the sanctimony. This forum is the pinnacle of good examples of behaviour (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:51:24
- tit. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 12:01:03
- I have absolutely nothin against you tbh. Just seemes a really inappropriate way to reply. (n/m) (NCFC) - avid_canary, Apr 28, 11:52:59
- You'd have preferred I started a post FAO BunnySCFC? (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:56:16
- yes that's exactly what I would have preffered. (n/m) (NCFC) - avid_canary, Apr 28, 11:58:13
- You'd have preferred I started a post FAO BunnySCFC? (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:56:16
- Thanks for the sanctimony. This forum is the pinnacle of good examples of behaviour (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:51:24
- Think that might have been the ref Pants, not their fans or players (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 28, 11:41:58
- 4-5 of theirs kicked off about a player, kicking the ball (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:49:36
- maybe, but inapprorpiate to bring it up in a thread where the bloke is (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 12:02:16
- How does that make it their fault? Still down to the ref. (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 28, 11:53:07
- Well the fact that 4-5 players kicking off, is actually not in the rules of the game (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:57:39
- Take your word for it mate, I dont know the rules tbh, find all this (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 28, 12:01:33
- Annoying when they make it up as they go along though (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 12:08:28
- Take your word for it mate, I dont know the rules tbh, find all this (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 28, 12:01:33
- Well the fact that 4-5 players kicking off, is actually not in the rules of the game (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:57:39
- 4-5 of theirs kicked off about a player, kicking the ball (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:49:36
- Thanks for reiterating what classy fans we have by having a sly dig ... (NCFC) - avid_canary, Apr 28, 11:48:54
- No need to apologise (NCFC) - BunnySCFC, Apr 28, 14:57:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.