Well said. There's been a lot of good logical posts in amongst the reactionary s**te,
That is definitely one of them.
Posted By: I Am Hoot on April 28th 2013 at 09:48:53
Message Thread
- The current obsession with the "shots on target" stat: (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Apr 28, 09:43:58
- Hinted a couple of times about the price of their squad (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:35:12
- IF we HAD just a couple of decent efforts on target no one would ever bring it up. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 10:24:38
- noone would notice, if it hadn't happened a fair few times since christmas (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 28, 10:30:06
- Agree (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Apr 28, 10:17:59
- I would just like some decent shots (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Apr 28, 10:01:50
- I can understand that..... (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Apr 28, 10:07:24
- disagree...... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 10:28:32
- we made sure of it by playing shit (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 28, 10:27:02
- I can understand that..... (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Apr 28, 10:07:24
- The second season back up was always going to be tough (NCFC) - scruffy, Apr 28, 09:59:20
- 3 goals away from home since the turn of the year tells its own story (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 28, 09:57:31
- Well said. There's been a lot of good logical posts in amongst the reactionary shite, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Apr 28, 09:48:53
- Good post. (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 28, 09:47:06
- mainly because... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 10:35:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.