Good post.

IIRC we won the game at home with a dodgy set piece goal and it was squeaky anus time for the next hour.

Not sure when two teams are so similar that people can be this tilty that we lost by such small margins.

Posted By: lurd on April 28th 2013 at 09:47:06

Message Thread

The current obsession with the "shots on target" stat: (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Apr 28, 09:43:58
- Hinted a couple of times about the price of their squad (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Apr 28, 11:35:12
- IF we HAD just a couple of decent efforts on target no one would ever bring it up. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 10:24:38
  - noone would notice, if it hadn't happened a fair few times since christmas (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 28, 10:30:06
- Agree (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Apr 28, 10:17:59
- I would just like some decent shots (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Apr 28, 10:01:50
  - I can understand that..... (NCFC) - HairyBobbingManAss, Apr 28, 10:07:24
    - disagree...... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 10:28:32
    - we made sure of it by playing shit (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 28, 10:27:02
- The second season back up was always going to be tough (NCFC) - scruffy, Apr 28, 09:59:20
- 3 goals away from home since the turn of the year tells its own story (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 28, 09:57:31
- Well said. There's been a lot of good logical posts in amongst the reactionary shite, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Apr 28, 09:48:53
- Good post. (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 28, 09:47:06
  - mainly because... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 10:35:52

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.