Some FACTS
1. It is unlikely that we would be getting better results under a new manager with the currently fit squad as JJ and Jim B as a central midfield pairing is woeful. Even f**king Mohurinio would struggle! FACT
2. Our current midfield even when all fit is not top six quality and if we do not add to it we are unlikely to go up no matter who is the manager. FACT
3. If we sack Worthy we will have a lot less money to invest in a midfield in January. FACT
4. Worthy does not have a history of arguing with his Board whereas some of the other managerial candidates being suggested do. FACT
5. Worthy?s managerial record here is the best we?ve had for a long time. FACT
6. Worthy has the experience of getting a team promoted out of this division. FACT
7. Its difficult to encourage players to move to Norwich down to location and peoples? perception of Norfolk being a bunch of inbred farmers. FACT
8. Worthy has made some decent signings (Ashton, Hucks) and tends to be better at identifying suitable players with a pricetag. His cheaper signings have been poorer. FACT
9. Worthy has raised the ambitions of the fans of this club and is coming under fire for a result of his earlier success compared to his failings now. FACT
10. If you were Delia or Michael, and had saved this club from near ruin and seen the successes under Worthy you would probably give him more time. FACT
Posted By: Butterworth on November 9th 2005 at 13:40:00
Message Thread
- Some FACTS (NCFC) - Butterworth, Nov 9, 13:40:00
- you make some good points but........... (NCFC) - Chopper, Nov 9, 14:17:58
- best we had was towards the end of last season... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Nov 9, 14:34:48
- I mean the promotion season (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Nov 9, 14:35:02
- best we had was towards the end of last season... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Nov 9, 14:34:48
- A FACT from me (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Nov 9, 14:09:52
- Decent FACT that (n/m) (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Nov 9, 14:14:08
- Fact from me (NCFC) - The Tudster, Nov 9, 14:13:35
- At the same time? (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Nov 9, 14:18:40
- Which one was better? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 9, 14:25:08
- Daughter was better, but no, not at the same time. That would have been disrepectful. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Tudster, Nov 9, 14:27:32
- Does either one know about the other? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 9, 14:34:05
- Hope not. Twas a long time ago. Actually, is was a hat trick, (NCFC) - The Tudster, Nov 9, 14:37:06
- Gosh you're a right regular stud (NCFC) - Charlotte Church, Nov 9, 14:40:21
- I bet he'd throw it down your throat, Charlotte, if you stood still long enough. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 9, 14:43:37
- Nah. I'd shag you though, (NCFC) - The Tudster, Nov 9, 14:42:39
- Gosh you're a right regular stud (NCFC) - Charlotte Church, Nov 9, 14:40:21
- Hope not. Twas a long time ago. Actually, is was a hat trick, (NCFC) - The Tudster, Nov 9, 14:37:06
- Does either one know about the other? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 9, 14:34:05
- Daughter was better, but no, not at the same time. That would have been disrepectful. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Tudster, Nov 9, 14:27:32
- Which one was better? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 9, 14:25:08
- At the same time? (n/m) (NCFC) - Partial Angler, Nov 9, 14:18:40
- Another FACT (NCFC) - Conspiracy Theorist, Nov 9, 14:00:46
- Most of those facts are opinions FACT (n/m) (NCFC) - Denizen, Nov 9, 13:47:34
- There are more holes in those "facts" than the cheese I had for lunch (n/m) (NCFC) - Swiss Yellow, Nov 9, 13:47:00
- I think you mentioned that earlier. (n/m) (NCFC) - The Tudster, Nov 9, 13:45:13
- you make some good points but........... (NCFC) - Chopper, Nov 9, 14:17:58
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.