haha yes!
Posted By: Brandonio on April 2nd 2013 at 16:49:04
Message Thread
- Been away so first chance to comment on Saturday (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 2, 15:17:35
- If the alternative to what we have now is a Villa or QPR-style all-out attack "unlucky" (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 15:46:53
- compare the attacking talent of our squad with Villa and QPR (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 2, 18:30:34
- The main problem as I see it, is Hughton is happy as long as we are drawing (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:04:47
- That's bullshit to be fair. Most people just want us to at least go forward a bit more (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Apr 2, 15:55:34
- It doesn't have to be one or the other though (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 2, 15:54:51
- It ought to, but it depends on how versatile your players are, the quality of the oppositi (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:04:22
- We did it last season (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:16:14
- PL is much harder this season, much tougher opposition (NCFC) - usacanary, Apr 2, 18:33:47
- Saturday as I keep saying is make or break (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:26:32
- If we lose on Saturday it will be a disgrace (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:39:31
- The bedwetters? (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 2, 19:10:55
- I was confident we'd do Wigan (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 2, 16:53:10
- Away teams not turning up is what has so many sides with their heads above the water (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:55:28
- Yeah, to be fair hardly anyone's looked good at CR (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:56:17
- it is a very shit league (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:57:56
- Just Liverpool and Chelsea really (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 2, 16:57:23
- Yep (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:57:56
- Very true (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 2, 16:56:13
- Yeah, to be fair hardly anyone's looked good at CR (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:56:17
- Away teams not turning up is what has so many sides with their heads above the water (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:55:28
- a pre-seethe!. Personally I'm keeping my powder dry. (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:48:19
- haha yes! (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:49:04
- Gotta have a chance against a side already looking to the summer holidays (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:41:33
- Finally a tiny glimpse of reality (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 2, 16:37:06
- Lose Saturday and we could be in real shit, Arsenal away next (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:39:25
- So it's a must-not-lose then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:42:59
- Home to Reading and WBA who will have nothing to play for (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:52:03
- Nothing to play for: (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:54:22
- nothing to play for away is always a bit different (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:56:43
- Like Villa last season (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:57:30
- nothing to play for away is always a bit different (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:56:43
- Nothing to play for: (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:54:22
- Home to Reading and WBA who will have nothing to play for (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:52:03
- So it's a must-not-lose then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:42:59
- Lose Saturday and we could be in real shit, Arsenal away next (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:39:25
- Yes, win Saturday and we can breathe relatively easily (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:30:21
- If we lose on Saturday it will be a disgrace (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:39:31
- Agreed. But it's always more difficult in the second season - there's more at stake. (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:23:11
- Holt has had a nightmare in his last 3 sub appearances (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:27:08
- I'd start him though (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:31:07
- Yeah I think we have to play him against Swansea (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:33:10
- I'd start him though (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:31:07
- Holt doesn't look the same player alone up front (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:25:11
- It's not that though - he hasn't suddenly come to life when he's had a partner (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:30:45
- Struggling for form, playing in a side not suited to him (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:37:52
- We never had an alternative tbf - Hoots should have addressed that. (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:41:52
- True that, none of the others are good enough. (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:43:45
- I always felt Jackson did well in the diamond alongside Holt (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:46:51
- He is a good little player, and offers something different (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:59:48
- You can't say that,Loz has decided that he's fucking shite... (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Apr 2, 16:51:21
- Not a prolific goal scorer though (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:51:09
- But we scored goals at difficult places with him in the team (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:52:22
- Yep, agreed. But he needs a goal-scorer to work alongside, so he's no alternative to Holt (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:58:34
- But we scored goals at difficult places with him in the team (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:52:22
- agree, he looked really good on occasion (n/m) (NCFC) - fal5taff, Apr 2, 16:48:05
- Hardly had a kick, like Fox (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:50:39
- yup, what i don't get is fox new contract. double-think on hughton's part... (n/m) (NCFC) - fal5taff, Apr 2, 16:59:29
- Probably agreed by Lambert? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 17:00:23
- Hoots picks the central midfield for their defensive abilities, not Fox's forte (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 17:02:22
- NO. The best form of defence is to keep the ball (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 17:04:36
- Agree 100% and said something similar on the Oink 'un this weekend (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 18:31:47
- NO. The best form of defence is to keep the ball (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 17:04:36
- is the only logical explanation i suppose... (n/m) (NCFC) - fal5taff, Apr 2, 17:01:00
- Hoots picks the central midfield for their defensive abilities, not Fox's forte (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 17:02:22
- Probably agreed by Lambert? (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 17:00:23
- yup, what i don't get is fox new contract. double-think on hughton's part... (n/m) (NCFC) - fal5taff, Apr 2, 16:59:29
- Hardly had a kick, like Fox (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:50:39
- I always felt Jackson did well in the diamond alongside Holt (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:46:51
- True that, none of the others are good enough. (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:43:45
- We never had an alternative tbf - Hoots should have addressed that. (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:41:52
- Struggling for form, playing in a side not suited to him (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:37:52
- It's not that though - he hasn't suddenly come to life when he's had a partner (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:30:45
- Holt has had a nightmare in his last 3 sub appearances (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 2, 16:27:08
- No arguably about it. Clearly a less talented side. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 2, 16:21:25
- We did it last season (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 2, 16:16:14
- It ought to, but it depends on how versatile your players are, the quality of the oppositi (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 16:04:22
- spot on (n/m) (NCFC) - ede, Apr 2, 15:21:34
- well said but 5 draws will comfortably do (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 2, 15:20:59
- % comfortably, 3 will be enough. Important thing is to avoid losing (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 2, 15:27:47
- %??? - *5* (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 2, 15:28:28
- % comfortably, 3 will be enough. Important thing is to avoid losing (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Apr 2, 15:27:47
- If the alternative to what we have now is a Villa or QPR-style all-out attack "unlucky" (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Apr 2, 15:46:53
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.