You are right. But we are still 12th highest net on fees. fees aren't everything.
but really to say we are miles behind many of the teams at the foot of the table is a bit dubious.
Posted By: phrankin on March 14th 2013 at 18:44:42
Message Thread
- Dear Wrath, my faith has been restored, some excellent discussion below...... (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 14, 18:07:05
- 12th highest net transfer fees (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 14, 18:24:14
- how much? (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 14, 20:49:39
- transfer fees and wage bills.......we live in the real world. (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 14, 18:35:53
- also how many PL owners are poorer than ours?.... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 14, 18:36:58
- You are right. But we are still 12th highest net on fees. fees aren't everything. (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 14, 18:44:42
- misleading info though (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 14, 18:58:07
- The clubs being where they are probably indicates money wasted (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 14, 19:03:01
- Southampton's spend is unreal... 37 million :o (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 14, 18:49:36
- QPR 42 million :o (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 14, 18:51:20
- misleading info though (NCFC) - Brandonio, Mar 14, 18:58:07
- You are right. But we are still 12th highest net on fees. fees aren't everything. (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 14, 18:44:42
- also how many PL owners are poorer than ours?.... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Mar 14, 18:36:58
- 12th highest net transfer fees (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 14, 18:24:14
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.