He is challenging him.

And that he didn't see him is equally entirely relevant in the case against Nani. He acted recklessly as he had no idea who was near him and therefore no idea as to who may be injured by it.

Posted By: Johnny Comecardiff on March 6th 2013 at 09:37:02

Message Thread

Official interpretation of Law 12 (Other Football) - Old Git, Mar 6, 08:47:38
- In that case, why wasn't the Real keeper sent off when he punched Vidic in the face? (Other Football) - SimonOTBC, Mar 6, 09:54:06
  - one case.... (Other Football) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 6, 09:58:55
    - I don't think that's worse than being punched at full force in the head (Other Football) - SimonOTBC, Mar 6, 10:18:26
      - I agree........ (Other Football) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 6, 10:21:01
        
        Yes - I think Keane was right that Nani gave him an excuse to get a red out (Other Football) - SimonOTBC, Mar 6, 10:24:10
        
        exactly! (Other Football) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 6, 10:26:13
- Intent is not relevant. For me it's whether or not he was challenging for the ball (Other Football) - Old Man, Mar 6, 08:58:16
  - Wonder if Nani remembers this red card incident: (Other Football) - CWC, Mar 6, 10:10:42
  - He is challenging him. (Other Football) - Johnny Comecardiff, Mar 6, 09:37:02

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.