Why would we play 4-4-2?
Posted By: BINMEN8R on February 9th 2013 at 20:04:56
Message Thread
- So if we were to play 4-4-2 (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 9, 19:49:29
- Why would we play 4-4-2? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 9, 20:07:36
- Didn't say he did it was a general question and for those (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 9, 20:14:12
- Well if you slowed down a little someone might answer you,it won't be though! (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 9, 20:17:30
- *me*. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 9, 20:17:47
- Well if you slowed down a little someone might answer you,it won't be though! (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 9, 20:17:30
- He did not say we should play 4-4-2. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 9, 20:10:28
- Didn't say he did it was a general question and for those (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 9, 20:14:12
- That's about it i think. whether it's our back four subconsciously playing deep or whether (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 9, 20:05:59
- I'm sure it's not the manager - you can see him on the touchline urging them upfield. (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 9, 20:13:49
- It could be that,you'd just hope that players with the experience of turner and bassong (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 9, 20:16:10
- Maybe Hoots/McNally need to tweak the goal scoring bonus (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Feb 9, 20:36:18
- It could be that,you'd just hope that players with the experience of turner and bassong (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 9, 20:16:10
- I'm sure it's not the manager - you can see him on the touchline urging them upfield. (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 9, 20:13:49
- Why would we play 4-4-2? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 9, 20:04:56
- Why would we play 4-4-2? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 9, 20:07:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.