For six months they may as well
They haven't got a lot to lose (other than his transfer fee reducing obviously). Plus trying to buy a replacement in January will be more expensive than in the summer
Posted By: Duck on January 22nd 2013 at 09:32:33
Message Thread
- Even if Hooper has turned down Celtics contract offer (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 22, 09:05:59
- Grant Holt to go the other way?? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 22, 09:37:48
- That would be ridiculous. Get rid of your only proven goalscorer in an attempt to sign (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 22, 09:52:00
- hmmm....... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 22, 10:05:14
- also..... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 22, 10:06:40
- hmmm....... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 22, 10:05:14
- My word that 'Moose' is a tw (n/m) (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jan 22, 09:41:34
- That would be ridiculous. Get rid of your only proven goalscorer in an attempt to sign (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 22, 09:52:00
- His value will reduce in 6 months. Thus reducing his transfer cut. (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 22, 09:23:00
- and something about his agent changing next month (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 22, 09:24:42
- Hooper Masterplan (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jan 22, 09:17:48
- But if he wants to go will Celtic want to keep an unhappy player? (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 22, 09:17:00
- For six months they may as well (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 22, 09:32:33
- they don't really need a replacement tho (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 22, 09:33:40
- For six months they may as well (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 22, 09:32:33
- Grant Holt to go the other way?? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 22, 09:37:48
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.