Neither of those
Hooper coming here will be down to Norwich City.
He is obviously interested in a move or we wouldn't keep bidding for him.
We will already know from is agent what kind of wage he wants and I'm sure we can afford that. It will be down to weather we pay the ?7-8mil that Celtic want.
Posted By: Trent_Canary on January 21st 2013 at 09:51:13
Message Thread
- geeting alot of (Hooper to Norwich - you aren't good enough for him) shit....... (NCFC) - Kirrie, Jan 21, 09:37:48
- Hooper isn't good enough for us (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 21, 10:04:32
- Disagree totally...he's a goalscorer and thats exactly what we need. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 21, 10:11:44
- jon hartson was a goalscorer in THAT pub league! lol! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 21, 10:26:58
- John Hartson was class until he hit 30/31 (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 21, 10:28:55
- stone (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Jan 21, 10:41:13
- the SPL made hartson look better than he was, when he was getting old. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 21, 10:33:18
- John Hartson was class until he hit 30/31 (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 21, 10:28:55
- jon hartson was a goalscorer in THAT pub league! lol! (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 21, 10:26:58
- Based on your extensive knowledge of his game? Better tell the NCFC scouts then (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 21, 10:11:15
- Disagree totally...he's a goalscorer and thats exactly what we need. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 21, 10:11:44
- Why Would Hooper Come Here? (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jan 21, 10:03:34
- I'm not buying it. Stick Celtic in a proper league and see how they get on. (NCFC) - Pit, Jan 21, 09:51:19
- Bit of a silly thing to say. (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 21, 09:55:30
- no proof they'd be a "lowing ranking prem team" - more like a top champ team IMO. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 21, 10:28:13
- They've not got a bad side. (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 21, 10:30:06
- if they were in the premier league they would be able to invest better too (n/m) (NCFC) - raretek, Jan 21, 14:05:33
- They've not got a bad side. (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 21, 10:30:06
- They are heavily in debt. Not as simple as it sounds. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pit, Jan 21, 10:03:01
- their religion based support has created the pointless league tho (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 21, 09:58:39
- Not sure where to start with that. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 21, 10:01:00
- there's no rush (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 21, 10:04:12
- Not sure where to start with that. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 21, 10:01:00
- no proof they'd be a "lowing ranking prem team" - more like a top champ team IMO. (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 21, 10:28:13
- Bit of a silly thing to say. (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 21, 09:55:30
- I can't see Hooper coming here (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 21, 09:42:10
- fairly sure he'll be joining tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 21, 09:51:59
- Can't see it (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 21, 10:00:45
- he'll be worth less in the summer (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 21, 10:03:35
- Can't see it (NCFC) - Duck, Jan 21, 10:00:45
- Neither of those (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 21, 09:51:13
- ^VMT. Also, celtic will play on the financial cost if we're relegated... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Jan 21, 09:51:06
- fairly sure he'll be joining tbh (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 21, 09:51:59
- Tell them Celtic being in the last 16 of the champions league is no different to (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 21, 09:39:20
- Also we've beaten them twice in the last year. (n/m) (NCFC) - Dog, Jan 21, 09:39:14
- Their reserves (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Jan 21, 10:00:37
- at a canter (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 21, 09:39:46
- Hooper isn't good enough for us (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 21, 10:04:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.