Walcott would be a rubbish goalie, so no.
Posted By: tim berry on November 28th 2012 at 23:48:16
Message Thread
- If it was an option would you take a straight swop... Walcott for Ruddy? (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 28, 23:44:58
- walcott is a bit small to be a goalie (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 28, 23:48:44
- not if we had a team of dwarves (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Nov 28, 23:51:37
- short passing game then (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 28, 23:53:03
- loads of free kicks for high tackles (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Nov 28, 23:55:57
- Wes would be 1st choice clearly (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Nov 28, 23:52:34
- short passing game then (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 28, 23:53:03
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Nov 28, 23:49:23
- don't you mean walbaby'sbed ?? (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Nov 28, 23:51:41
- not if we had a team of dwarves (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, Nov 28, 23:51:37
- Walcott would be a rubbish goalie, so no. (n/m) (NCFC) - tim berry, Nov 28, 23:48:16
- Tough one (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Nov 28, 23:48:07
- No (NCFC) - Surrey Yella, Nov 28, 23:47:21
- Ohhhhh (NCFC) - Surrey Yella, Nov 28, 23:51:18
- Vital consideration (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Nov 28, 23:49:58
- No chance. I'd prefer a better player if no cash was involved.. (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Nov 28, 23:47:15
- walcott is a bit small to be a goalie (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 28, 23:48:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.