This man's not for turning

Strange piece from Rick, I agree. Is this balanced reporting gone mad?

He's right about Francis' contribution in the first half of the season, of course - but doesn't that just make it all the more frustrating that he just couldn't be arsed at the point at which we needed him most?

From that point of view, the first article was still spot-on. I just wouldn't be letting the lazy sod off the hook quite so easily.

Posted By: sheringhamcanary on May 19th 2005 at 15:03:10

Message Thread

Massive piece of humble pie for Mr Waghorn.... (NCFC) - pkdo75, May 19, 14:32:26
- both articles are spot on (NCFC) - megson, May 19, 15:30:48
  - What the fans who voted him second in POTS vote!! (NCFC) - pkdo75, May 19, 22:18:22
  - agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, May 19, 15:39:41
- Of course, had you actually posted the entire bit about Francis... (NCFC) - Arganth, May 19, 15:27:04
- This man's not for turning (NCFC) - sheringhamcanary, May 19, 15:03:10
  - You seem to appear whenever RW is mentioned? (NCFC) - pkdo75, May 19, 17:30:18
- I still think Francis was... (NCFC) - Delveg, May 19, 14:41:05
  - What did Francis do over the last 10 games or so? (NCFC) - pkdo75, May 19, 17:39:11
  - one thing I will say in his defence... (NCFC) - mr carra, May 19, 14:45:39
    - despite that, WHAT DID FRANCIS DO towards the end of the season ? (NCFC) - oh arr, May 19, 15:01:23
      - I'm not disagreeing with that... (NCFC) - mr carra, May 19, 15:06:32
- Yea, just read that... (NCFC) - Ashton4England, May 19, 14:37:28
- Yes, just posted something like that, Rick probably (NCFC) - Babyface, May 19, 14:35:17

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.