right

first one i thought we were going out until we actually changed it

2nd one it was indeed terrible

3rd one morison has proved time and again he is hopeless when through. last night he couldn't be arsed to even have a run at goal

4th one tierney was a huge liability for us all night tho against a decent player. indeed he nearly cost us with the late penalty tho it did look a tad dubious

5th one yeah i thought it was over as we didn't look like scoring with the players we had on the pitch

6th one spot on too so basically all totally valid posts

i notice you failed to highlight my post just before we equalised that noted we had an attacking threat now

and also my prediction we'd win 2-1 as the free kick was about to be taken which jacko scored from

Posted By: SCC 28 on November 1st 2012 at 08:36:06

Message Thread

Dear SCC is it an attention thing that compels you to troll constantly?.. (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Nov 1, 08:25:23
- Plainly is. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 1, 10:09:43
- LOL would argue that black is white (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Nov 1, 08:42:46
  - in the dark (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:43:05
    - No (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Nov 1, 08:51:35
      - yes i meant white is black (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:55:14
- may i ask what it is to make you accuse others of that? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:27:49
  - There is that my dear + all the other stuff (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Nov 1, 08:31:50
    - like the 3 massive shouts that saw us secure the win? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:40:50
      - hate to be the one who has to break this to you (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 1, 09:07:16
        
        give it up, Tombs. He's completely indefatigable. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 1, 09:10:09
        
        hes be entertaining on question time (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 1, 09:15:30
        
        nope you put up 2 posts which were ultimately wrong (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 09:12:57
        
        i think 2 of them were cracking reads of the game tbh (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 09:08:54
        
        ok (n/m) (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 1, 09:10:06
        
        but yes obviously they had no bearing on the game (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 09:09:35
  - ................ (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 1, 08:30:37
    - right (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:36:06
      - here (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:38:36
        
        ................ (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 1, 08:39:23
        
        Reasonably predictable wasn't it? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Nov 1, 08:52:34
        
        ..... (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:40:21
    - forgive my ignorance but (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 1, 08:35:54
      - always been psychic tbh (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:39:39
        
        fair play to you then (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 1, 08:50:00
        
        lol just commented on what i saw (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:53:21
        
        no probs (NCFC) - Tombs, Nov 1, 08:57:40
        
        Playing two totally separate teams should mean (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 1, 09:00:20
        
        Really hope Hoots sticks with that (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 1, 09:01:37
        
        but don't we have to go for it a bit now? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 09:05:28
        
        I'd play Jackson ahead of Butterfield (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 1, 09:08:02
        
        we just don't look like scoring without holt (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 09:11:38
        
        Always a hostage to fortune posting during a match... (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 1, 08:57:11
        
        lol yes and when it comes to tennis (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 08:59:40
        
        Bet there were a few Querrey fans (if there are any) (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 1, 09:01:33
        
        maybe a family member (NCFC) - SCC 28, Nov 1, 09:03:24
        
        And the Arsenal one actually (NCFC) - duke of york, Nov 1, 08:58:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.