I don't see many reasons for BJ to be in the team while Tettey's fit
Tettey is better defensively, athletically, technically and going forward. Might as well play Fox whose passing adds so much to the team.
Having said that we might lose some solidity without Johnson, yet at the same time is it worth sacrificing that for a shade more attacking quality?
It's a very fine balance between being solid and having the ability to shred teams tom pieces. We won't concede too many with the set up from the last two games but will it be good enough to score enough goals and gain enough points over a season? That's my worry.
Posted By: Common Sense Police on October 27th 2012 at 19:12:38
Message Thread
- One of the most impressive apects of the last two weeks is... (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 19:05:42
- same happened against spurs, qpr and west ham (NCFC) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 19:46:54
- I don't see many reasons for BJ to be in the team while Tettey's fit (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Oct 27, 19:12:38
- be interesting how strong our side is v Spurs (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 27, 19:15:49
- It's a good time to make the change. (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Oct 27, 19:18:27
- Be interesting to see how strong Spurs are too (n/m) (NCFC) - promethian1, Oct 27, 19:16:51
- I hope they have a strong side for tomorrow! (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Oct 27, 19:21:33
- be interesting how strong our side is v Spurs (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 27, 19:15:49
- WTF.....should be "aspects" (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Oct 27, 19:06:27
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.