But that means dropping Holt, unless you drop Wes which would be - Wrath of the Barclay

But that means dropping Holt, unless you drop Wes which would be

suicidal...I'm more optimistic than I was last season, we are a lot better side.

Posted By: BINMEN8R on October 27th 2012 at 17:13:29

Message Thread

Didn't think we were very good despite our dominance. (Other Football) - Lurkerino, Oct 27, 17:00:13
- Didn't think we were very good?? we battered them even with 11. (n/m) (Other Football) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 17:07:22
- finishing just not clinical enough still (Other Football) - SCC 28, Oct 27, 17:02:44
  - Agreed. I still worry where the goals will come from. (n/m) (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Oct 27, 17:05:44
    - Our Jan super signing? (n/m) (Other Football) - loz, Oct 27, 17:06:38
      - Hopefully the whole team contributes but a classy striker would be nice! (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Oct 27, 17:10:09
        
        Yea be nice to get butterfield involved.. (Other Football) - loz, Oct 27, 17:14:52
        
        But that means dropping Holt, unless you drop Wes which would be (Other Football) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 17:13:29
        
        Or just serious competition for Holt? Never rule out the diamond either (n/m) (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Oct 27, 17:15:49
        
        PL loved the diamond Hoots loves 4-2-1-2-1 we're more solid (Other Football) - BINMEN8R, Oct 27, 17:18:43
        
        I'm just mentioning the diamond in relation to playing two strikers plus Wes. (Other Football) - Common Sense Police, Oct 27, 17:23:22
        
        We've created good chances before but we're just not putting them away (Other Football) - Old Man, Oct 27, 17:22:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.