I agree with that in many ways.

But maybe it was down to the rather workmanlike nature of the rest of the team he was in - all good players by and large, but without the flair and ability of the 1993 team, especially after they were relegated and we spent all the parachute payment on Lee Croft. In 1993 we had Crook, Fox, and Sutton who could all change a game.

Posted By: APB on July 27th 2012 at 08:40:13

Message Thread

It just struck me.... (NCFC) - Kev, Jul 27, 05:14:37
- mmmm..... none of them as good as Huckerby in his prime. (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jul 27, 07:12:17
  - Huckerby is the only Norwich player I have ever seen who could change a game on his own (NCFC) - Ben, Jul 27, 08:24:18
    - I agree with that in many ways. (NCFC) - APB, Jul 27, 08:40:13
      - Eadie could and for a brief time Keef O'Neill (NCFC) - Jim, Jul 27, 09:51:35
        
        Can't seeing us ever being able to afford and 'edge of the seat' player like eadie/hucks. (n/m) (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jul 27, 10:11:31
      - none of those (Crook, Fox or Sutton) had the game-changing abilities Hucks had though (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jul 27, 08:48:49
        
        Eadie was brillers but he was a proper old fashioned winger whilst Hucks... (NCFC) - DrDublin, Jul 27, 09:45:55
- Fiiiiiiiiiiive huckerbys.... Four hucker.. Etc (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jul 27, 06:23:14

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.